Before we begin the first Collaborative Studio session, we needed to do some tasks to prepare for the session.
The first thing that needed to be done was acquire a Creative Partner. I was asked by Anna if I would like to be her Creative Partner as she felt that we had a similar temperament and hard-working nature. I felt that this would be quite a good matching as she is very hand-drawn and crafty in her creative responses to briefs and I felt that this would be something that I would like to try and compliment within my practise.
The second thing we needed to do was choose 3 briefs together that we would potentially like to work on which were D&AD and YCN Briefs of 2014. I didn't want to do a D&AD brief as I was already focusing on one, plus, when we had a look there wasn't a brief which excited either of us.
Bear YCN Brief 2014Available from http://www.ycn.org/awards/ycn-student-awards/2013-2014/briefs/bear (Accessed 2nd February 2014) |
Cath Kidston YCN BriefAvailable from http://www.ycn.org/awards/ycn-student-awards/2013-2014/briefs/cath-kidston (Accessed 2nd February 2014) |
Boost YCN Brief 2014 Available from http://www.ycn.org/awards/ycn-student-awards/2013-2014/briefs/boost (Accessed 30th January 2014) |
After deciding on the 3 briefs we wanted to look at, we then had to separately answer the questions individually on a sheet in relation to the chosen briefs and the chosen Creative Partner.
Individual Collaborative Sheet |
During the studio session, we got into our pairs and we had to go through each of the briefs we have chosen. We had to make a list of pros and cons for each brief and select one to do based on this discussion:
Bear Brief
Pros:
- Open to your imagination. Creative and idea-based
- Plays to our strengths
- Expand it to a large product range
Cons:
- Quite a lot of work if we did the full alphabet- could do just vowels
- Would have to think outside the box
- How can we approach the brief differently?
Boost Brief
Pros:
- Choosing own flavours gives more ownership over brief
- Never done bottle packaging- try something new
- Brief lends itself to job delegation
Cons:
- Target audience is unspecific and indecisive
- Could spend a lot of time doing flavour ideas that we could loose site of the brief
- Terrible tone of voice
Cath Kidston
Pros:
- Never done pattern design before- try something new
- Plays to the strength of illustration
- Expand the product range
Cons:
- Limited idea/ concept range
- Target audience is too specific
- Not much work for 2 people
From these pros and cons, Anna and myself decided to focus on the Bear brief as we felt it could be very imaginative and free for us to produce a response that is fun. I felt that we would be able to produce a series which could be collectable if we did this brief as a double team.
From deciding the brief, we then had to re-write the Collaborative sheet but we had to do it together.
Collaborative Sheet by the Partnership |
As a class, we had to make a list of roles and responsibilities that we would have to take on during the collaboration creative process.
Roles:
- Project Management
- Time Management
- Resources
- Contacts/ Communications
Responsibilities:
- Style/ Brand Guidelines
- Research
- Fulfiling Your Agreement
- Meet Deadlines
- Maintaining Clear Communications
This was to make it so we started to become more specific in our approach to listing roles and responsibilities.
Study Task:
For the next session, we need to focus our roles and responsibilities so we need to produce a new version of the Collaborative Sheet with more specific roles and responsibilities given to each other. This needs to be typed up and handed in. Also, we need to come up with some initial ideas and concepts.
Alongside this, me and Anna decided to do some Research based on the topic of Bear and divided up some potential areas of research to give us a wider understanding of the market. (See Design Context Blog). We each produced some quick design boards to present our research.
Digital Design Boards of my Research |
Initial Brainstorm |
Based on Anna's research, she suggested children of the age of 4-5 as the target audience who are either just about to start school or who have done a year of school. We liked this as this meant we would have more of a scope in regards to how inventive we could be.
Idea Generation |
The main idea we came up with was the idea of basing the boxes on the 6 week holidays, having one box out per week of the holidays which would show a list of 7 things that could be done in that scenario, 1 for every day of that week. We felt that they could be based on things kids tend to do when they are on their 6 week holidays, such as being at home or in the garden but also places they could go to, like a farm, seaside, village fete or camping. This would encourage them to explore with nature and get them doing things rather than being sat around not doing anything which seemed fitting with the natural healthy ethos of the brand.
Idea Development |
Following on from this, we made a list of possible responsibilities and roles which would be needed if we were to fulfil the brief in this manner.
Roles and Responsibilities Brainstorm |
From this list, we went back to the Collaborative Sheet that we wrote during the session and developed it by including the more specific roles and responsibilities that we outlined within the brainstorm.
Collaboration Agreement for Hand In |
No comments:
Post a Comment